今天，新航道gre培訓(xùn)班繼續(xù)給大家GRE寫作中的【The Issue Task】精講，幫助大家更好地備考GRE寫作，歡迎鎖定!

  前兩講(Analyze an Issue Task的第3、4講)，我們學(xué)習(xí)了GRE寫作中Analyze an Issue Task中頗具難度的一種指令：

  Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

  接下來兩講，我們看第三種指令：

  Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reasonon which that claim is based.

  很明顯，這種指令與前4講涉及的兩種指令又不一樣了，(詳見Analyze an Issue Task的第1-4講)其主要區(qū)別在于：

  * 指令構(gòu)成：本題型的prompt由兩個(gè)陳述句所構(gòu)成。其一稱作claim，也就是一個(gè)觀點(diǎn)、結(jié)論、或聲稱。另一則稱作reason，即擁躉上述結(jié)論的理由或論據(jù);所以，這種題型可以簡單粗暴理解為“對(duì)兩句話之間的causality的詳盡探討與分析”。翻譯過來，此類task direction就可稱為“因果類”題型。

  當(dāng)然，筆者行文中一定要分別表明對(duì)reason和claim的立場(chǎng)如何，這是題中明確要求的。至于同意還是不同意，無所謂，ETS絲毫不care我們的立場(chǎng)。

  * 謀篇布局：值得一提的是，reason & claim之間的推導(dǎo)關(guān)系(在issue pool里的大多數(shù)題中)很有可能是存疑的，例如會(huì)有忽略他因、過分外推等情況出現(xiàn)。

  筆者推薦大家行文采用“順推法”，即：先reason后claim. 推導(dǎo)要細(xì)心：就算reason成立，它是否是構(gòu)成claim的reason呢?也就是說，有沒有可能存在其他原因也可以推出這個(gè)claim呢?

  PS：對(duì)Issue Task目標(biāo)在4分以上的朋友，這個(gè)推導(dǎo)關(guān)系這一段可要好好寫咯!

  我們以一個(gè)題目為例：

  Claim: In any field - business, politics, education, government - those in power should step down after five years.

  Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.

  發(fā)現(xiàn)了么，題干中是不是存在著各種筆者上述的“坑”?不容分說，筆者的立場(chǎng)為“不同意”。嗯，對(duì)，兩句話都不同意。于是乎，筆者的敵方觀點(diǎn)就可以是“領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)更迭對(duì)企業(yè)走向成功挺重要的”或“商界、政界、教育界中的當(dāng)權(quán)者在位五年后就遠(yuǎn)離權(quán)力走廊也是行得通的”。筆者以此二思路做了個(gè)的梗概及大體寫作演示，如下：

  [Introduction]

  The insatiable desire for raking in profits, dereliction of duty, and corruption are such stains that are at odds with a leader’s usually-positive public image. However, I tend to think that these are rare cases, and that the arguer of this issue may be excessively pessimistic so that he/she recklessly equates those less-frequent blemishes with fatal failure or downfall and thus strongly advocate the revitalization of leadership at an interval of five years.

  【本段解析】

  簡單快捷即可，不要陷入“鋪場(chǎng)景”的泥潭。一個(gè)長難句把筆者對(duì)reason及claim的觀點(diǎn)寫清就行。

  [Body Para. 1]

  論證思路：就逮著reason里面的絕對(duì)詞猛打就完事了唄。

  I can hardly side with the statement that the most effective path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. Rarely does it happen that a hero does his/ her utmost to save a desperate situation in this modern commercial world. The legendary Beowulf might exist, but who knows where the next one is. With the competition amongst various companies and even industries increasingly intensified, we cannot always expect individualism and heroism to work a lot all the time. In another word, there are many other pivotal factors determining whether an enterprise can stand out and succeed in the market, such as the brain tank, the loyalty and dedication of employees, and, more importantly, the golden opportunities of the times. The ups and downs of Eron, a world-renowned Internet company, can serve as a compelling illustration, since its leaders without any exception prioritize the centralization of power and absolute authority rather than the sound communication in the whole enterprise, which of course is a harbinger of its downfall. In this case, if the inner managerial structure and economic set-ups cannot be innovated and reinvigorated, what is the point of merely nominating a new leader?

  【本段解析】

  還是比較貼合托福寫作的語域和風(fēng)格的，保個(gè)4+先。切記，考場(chǎng)上不用像筆者這樣去“堆”例子，因?yàn)槔犹俺浴敝R(shí)儲(chǔ)備了，你懂的。

  [Body Para. 2]

  敵方觀點(diǎn)與見招拆招，且聽下回分解。

  [Body Para. 3]

  轉(zhuǎn)述introduction的主要論點(diǎn)即可，且聽下回分解。

  [Conclusion]

  轉(zhuǎn)述introduction的主要論點(diǎn)即可，且聽下回分解。

請(qǐng)加sunny老師（微信號(hào)：shnc_2018）

百人留學(xué)備考群，名師答疑，助教監(jiān)督，分享最新資訊，領(lǐng)取獨(dú)家資料。掃碼免費(fèi)加入